Disagreements
I recently participated in an exercise that I think will ultimately lead me to becoming a better person. I checked out three books that were authored or edited by people I strongly disagree with: an atheist, a group of gnostics, and a democrat. "Letter to a Christian Nation" is a short book written by an atheist to a Christian audience spelling out of the ills religion in general and Christianity in particular have visited upon society. It was interesting to read a perspective like that, and it did bring to light some of the areas that I realize Christians need to improve on in order to more effectively spread the Gospel of Christ. "The Gospel of Judas" is a reprint of a third (I believe) century document that tells the story of Christ from the perspective of Judas Isacariot, the apostle who betrayed Jesus. In short, Judas did a good thing because he freed Jesus from the fleshly world so that He could return to the spiritual world. The third book was Barack Obama's "Audacity of Hope." I have not yet completed Obama's book. Although I disagree with virtually every opinion Obama holds, I really appreciate his attitude.
Of the three, I must say I find the most validity with gnosticism (that is not saying much). I have just seen too much in my limited experience on this earth to say there is no god of any kind. Something is out there; I obviously believe that God is the Creator and Jesus is His Son. Politically, on a very simplistic level, I just cannot accept the basic tenets of liberalism as I understand them. With gnosticism, it is such a detailed and involved thought pattern that it intrigues me. Plus, if you disagree with a gnostic, they can say, "I have secret knowledge that you just do not understand." How great is that? I am really not being persuaded by gnosticism, but it is a rational, logical explanation of spirituality.
It has been interesting reading these perspectives. I have gained a greater understanding of where other people are coming from while at the same time becoming more grounded in my own positions. It also helps me in my own self-reflection by leading me to ask, "Why do I believe this way? Is it valid or appropriate?" Now, I am going to go back to reading the people I know I can 100% agree with: those who maintain Michael Jordan is the greatest athlete ever.
Of the three, I must say I find the most validity with gnosticism (that is not saying much). I have just seen too much in my limited experience on this earth to say there is no god of any kind. Something is out there; I obviously believe that God is the Creator and Jesus is His Son. Politically, on a very simplistic level, I just cannot accept the basic tenets of liberalism as I understand them. With gnosticism, it is such a detailed and involved thought pattern that it intrigues me. Plus, if you disagree with a gnostic, they can say, "I have secret knowledge that you just do not understand." How great is that? I am really not being persuaded by gnosticism, but it is a rational, logical explanation of spirituality.
It has been interesting reading these perspectives. I have gained a greater understanding of where other people are coming from while at the same time becoming more grounded in my own positions. It also helps me in my own self-reflection by leading me to ask, "Why do I believe this way? Is it valid or appropriate?" Now, I am going to go back to reading the people I know I can 100% agree with: those who maintain Michael Jordan is the greatest athlete ever.
